<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Engram Hypotheses</title>
    <link>https://engram-hypotheses.vercel.app/</link>
    <description>Candidate, AI-surfaced hypotheses: grounded, sourced, cross-model verified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>The accuracy lost converting a network to spikes may be a clock problem, not a hard limit</title>
      <link>https://engram-hypotheses.vercel.app/h/ann-snn-conversion-temporal-alignment/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://engram-hypotheses.vercel.app/h/ann-snn-conversion-temporal-alignment/</guid>
      <category>neuromorphic computing</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The latency and accuracy gap introduced when an artificial neural network is converted to a spiking neural network may track a single quantity, how well spike-train firing rates are temporally aligned across layers, rather than being an irreducible cost of spiking, suggesting the gap is a synchronization artifact, not a fundamental limit.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>